EBENEZER ELLIOTT
(1781 - 1849)
PART A A REVIEW OF "MEMOIRS OF EBENEZER ELLIOTT" (1852) BY JANUARY SEARLE, THE NOM DE PLUME OF GEORGE SEARLE PHILLIPS
The reviewer agreed with Paul Rodgers (another friend of the bard) who commented "that Elliott, as a writer, is very little known, and poorly appreciated, in Sheffield." Yet the reviewer also recognised that Elliott was "one who in his day did good service for humanity" and who "occupied no ordinary position among his contemporaries." He went on to regret that the "Laureate of Free Trade," as he called Elliott, was distracted from writing poems on natural scenes, and he feared that "The Bard of Trade" was blinkered by tunnel vision: the obsession with free trade had hampered his development. The reviewer then observed that free trade was not the cure-all that a naive Elliott had promulgated. Hence we note that the reviewer had an ambivalent view of the Corn Law Rhymer & of his abilities. The reviewer uses several quotations from January Searle's book; one of them is shown below since it is an excellent example of Elliott's rhetoric. The quotation, which has now been traced to an Elliott letter of 1842 addressed to Paul Rodgers, reveals the Corn Law Rhymer slamming the Whigs in a most amusing manner:-In Part A, we are actually concerned with the reviewer rather than the book reviewed! Unfortunately the reviewer's name is unknown (though see later about this). However, he shows he was well acquainted with the Poet of the Poor & he makes interesting observations which are worth publicising.
|
Elliott often made use of repetition, but here he was quite witty; a rare combination for the Poet of the Poor.
Towards the end of the long review, we learn that the men of Sheffield had been niggardly with donations to a memorial for the Corn Law Rhymer (more of this in Part B). The reviewer then called Elliott a genius which is at odds with the reviewer's earlier opinions of the Poet of the Poor. The miserable free traders, we hear, ignored and slighted the "Bard of Trade" while being very generous to less deserving espousers of their cause. Finally in Part A, there is an unpublished letter by the Rhymer - this appears below. It shows Elliott disallusioned about the market for poetry, it sees him making encouraging remarks to a young poet (something he always did) & generously inviting the young man to visit Great Houghton. In a postscript, Elliott tells an anecdote which illustrates his amusing self-depreciation.
"CORN LAW RHYMES."
* When Mr. Tait was in
Sheffield, some years ago, he enquired at the Tontine, and of several
decent-looking folks in the streets and shops, for one Ebenezer
Elliott. Of course, none of them knew such a person. At last,
he met a Wadsley grinder, and enquired of him. "Oh," said Flatback,
"Yo' mean Cornlaw Rhymes." |
The anecdote, of course, backed up the view expressed earlier that Elliott was little known by the well-to-do of Sheffield while it also indicated he was at least appreciated by working people.
A problem with Elliott's letter is that we do not know to whom it was addressed. Seeing that it was dated 1844 - eight years before it appeared in the newspaper - it is reasonable to conclude that the letter had been posted to the reviewer himself; who would also be a poet. In addition, Ebenezer signed the letter "Corn Law Rhymes" which suggests the recipient was on good terms with the Corn Law Rhymer. The proprietors of the Sheffield Free Press were William Eaton and John Blenkin; one of these characters may have been the target of Elliott's letter & at the same time the writer of the book review "Memoirs of Ebenezer Elliott." It is often reported that Elliott signed his letters CLR or the Corn Law Rhymer and that he took great delight in this. Yet nearly all letters examined have been signed boldly & with a flourish "Ebenezer Elliott" - the letter above is significant since its signature supports the CLR signature legend.Part B deals with a "Burns' Gathering" as reported in the Sheffield Free Press of January 31st 1852. This 32nd anniversary do took place at the "Old Cock," a public house in Paradise Square run, appropriately enough, by one Tam McQuae! The event was clearly a most formidable night out for lovers of literature and whisky. The newspaper reported that James Marsden occupied the chair and soon started the first of many toasts, "the repast having been concluded, the 'haggis' partaken of, and the cloths drawn." After toasting the Queen, Prince Albert, the Royal Family & Burns, officials competed to toast their fellow committee members & any poets they could think of! The toasting was interspersed with songs and poems. The longest toast was made by a Mr A. Earnshaw who spoke at length about the Poet of the Poor. Earnshaw had many interesting points to make about Elliott in the speech which appears below as reported by the Sheffield Free Press.
It was said of Elliott, "he was rugged:" so he might be; but he was truthful. (Applause.) The more we read of him, the more we admire him. Years ago, we read, but did not understand him. Now we read him and revere his memory. (Hear, hear) He threw a halo round Sheffield, of which Sheffield and Sheffield men should be proud. He felt sorry that his memory had been neglected or regarded with coldness. There was an effort made to raise a monument to him. Some had asked for bread, and received a stone; but to Ebenezer Elliott - who had striven to emancipate England from a tax under which she groaned, and who was by common consent named the "Corn Law Rhymer," - they refused a stone. (Hear, hear.) It was a disgrace to Sheffield that his monument was not reared, and that the subscription list was in its present state. He had only spoken of him
as a poet; and as such they had read and appreciated his writings.
If any had not done so, let them read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest
Ebenezer Elliott's writings. They would profit by them.
(Applause.) He would now speak of him in his social relations.
A better man as a father, as a friend, as a social companion, as a kind
hearted being, than Ebenezer Elliott, never existed.
(Applause.) "The Memory of Ebenezer
Elliott." |
The reviewer
concluded his report of the evening's junket that after numerous toasts "the
harmony of the night was not broken in upon until the day had dawned."
Yes, they certainly knew how to party in Sheffield in 1852! And as the
reviewer stated " The night was spent in harmony without alloy."
To return to Ebenezer Research Foundry,
please strike the anvil