foundry masthead


 


EBENEZER ELLIOTT
(1781 - 1849)






In this selection of short but informative pieces, we come across an amazing petition to Parliament which Elliott himself made in 1841, followed by an unpublished letter to the North Midland Railway after Elliott was arrested for trespass! The third item is a short speech made at a Chartist meeting in Sheffield. While all these were from 1841, the bard's bankruptcy of 1816 is our next concern with details of his possessions being touted for auction. Again, information which is being revealed for the first time. The editor is grateful for the help of Diane Gascoyne who unearthed all the information presented here.



ELLIOTT'S PETITION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

    The humble petition of Ebenezer Elliott, of Sheffield, steel-manufacturer, to the Honourable the Commons' House, in Parliament assembled, humbly sheweth - That in the opinion of your petitioner, no legislative measure short of total and immediate repeal of all laws which prevent the importation of food into this country, can save your petitioner, the class to which he belongs, and all other classes of Britons from utter ruin: that a majority of the members of your Honourable House, he believes, fatally ignorant of their own true interests, are opposed to such repeal: that your petitioner knows not why the ignorance dominant, he fears in your Honourable House, should be allowed to ruin him: that your petitioner, therefore, humbly prays, that your Honourable House, (with the concurrence of the other branches of the Legislature,) will forthwith grant to the manufacturing and trading classes of this country, A SEPARATE LEGISLATURE, which if the food-monopoly is to be retained, and if there is force in the scripture precept "know thyself," could not fail, he believes, to benefit every member of your Honourable House; because it would speedily teach the idle annuitants in this country, called landowners, what a comical set of all important personages they really are. And your petitioner will ever pray.
           Sheffield, 1st June, 1841.          EBENEZER ELLIOTT

The document is very interesting since it displays Elliott's determination to bring about free trade: the conventional channels have failed the Poet of the Poor & in his desperation he goes right to the top.  Did he really think this would work? Probably not!  The style is hectoring which would irritate the House & would surely prompt the petition to be dismissed without consideration. You can't help admiring the Rhymer's cheek, though.  His petition was forwarded "to our representative, Mr Ward, for presentation in the House of Commons, on Friday night."



THE RHYMER'S 1841 LETTER TO THE NORTH MIDLAND RAILWAY

    To the DIRECTORS of the NORTH MIDLAND RAILWAY, at their Head Quarters in London, and all their little Bashaws elsewhere.

    SIRS, - Having occasion to visit the neighbourhood of Great Houghton on the 31st ultimo, I determined to return to Darfield along the Chapel lane, an old and favourite walk of mine, which I had not traced for some years.  When I reached Little Houghton, I found a road to the right, which, it appears, leads to a bridge over the railway; and here, Sirs, had you not been of the Bashaw species, you would have fixed a notice, informing strangers and the public, that Chapel lane is no longer a road.  It is true, that about 500 yards farther down the lane, a rail is placed athwart it; and that when I reached the railway, (that is, when I had got in your trap,) information reached both my eyes and my ears, that I must return.  Had the persons who interdicted my passage informed me, that there is a bridge over the railway a few hundred yards to the right, I should have at once returned rather than trespass; although men, sixty years old, do not always, after walking six or seven miles, find it pleasant to lengthen unnecessarily their journey.  But as I did not see the bridge, and knew not then of its existence, I concluded that I must either cross the railway, or return to Great Houghton - two miles out of my way - before I could reach Darfield.  I therefore crossed the railway, and was taken in custody by a person, who told me that I must go with him to a Mr. Priest, or I should be compelled.  I went with him along the railway to Darfield, where an officer took down my name and address.  Only the day before, a stranger (similarly caught in this trap of yours) was brought by your servants before Mr Cooke, a magistrate, who told them, that he will not punish trespassers from Chapel lane, until you affix a proper notice, at the proper place, namely, at Little Houghton.

    I find no fault with the conduct of your servants at Darfield: they did their duty in a civil and respectful manner: but I complain that I have been grossly annoyed, merely because you, being of the Bashaw species, cannot condescend, without violence to your high tendencies, "to affix a proper notice at the proper place."

    Now, my fine fellows, it is all very well to be fine fellows; but do not go out of your way to insult the public, lest you bring the devil across the shoulders of the company, and of other companies, in addition to the weight which they laid on their own, when they appointed you.

                        I am, Sirs, your most obedient servant,

                                            EBENEZER ELLIOTT, C.L.R.
Sheffield, 2nd April, 1841.


The letter is purely of local interest really, but it reveals that Elliott was still capable of walking several miles which was very good for a man of his years (60 years being a good age at the time).  It is amusing to see the elderly poet collared & getting his name taken.  As a local celebrity, the "arrest" would have been a notable event for both parties. No doubt, the case was much discussed, too, in Darfield & vicinity over the next few weeks! The tone of the letter is quite mischievous which would have helped the Poet of the Poor make his point to the railway directors.  The word "Bashaw," which Elliott used in the letter, refers to a  courtesy title used in the Turkish forces - here it probably is mischieviously used to signify unreliable foreigners.

Elliott moved from Sheffield to Great Houghton in January 1841, a couple of months before he wrote the letter.  He points out that the fateful walk was a favourite one which he had not walked for a few years; thus revealing that the Rhymer was familiar with the area before purchasing his new house.  This makes his move to the wastes of Great Houghton more understandable - hitherto, it seemed the house was bought only because it was a great bargain. 

Note also that the letter was written in Sheffield, not from the Hargate Hill address.  Other letters of this period have this oddity:  the  Rhymer was staying with family in Sheffield; something which he often did. Note the initials after the signature - a rare occurrence of the poet reminding people that he was the famous Corn Law Rhymer!



1841 SPEECH AT A SHEFFIELD CHARTIST MEETING

This item is from a report of a Whit Monday meeting in Sheffield's Paradise Square.  The report appeared in the Sheffield Independent newspaper for June 5th 1841. Please bear in mind that the summary below is a journalist's report on Elliott's speech and not the actual speech.  After the Rhymer's speech, the chair read both motion & amendment; the following show of hands was unanimous according to the chair, though the journalist was not at all sure that he agreed!


Mr. ELLIOTT said, - (cheers) - I cannot understand why any honest Chartist should refuse to discuss the wrongs which shew that the Charter is wanted: I am a Chartist, and I prove it by my readiness to discuss any of the wrongs of the people.  I make a religion of the Charter; - (disturbance) - but, to use the words of O'Connell, I should deserve to break my neck, if I would enter my political church no way, but over-the-weathercock. 

    The business of the long-winded stranger who has addressed you, is to persuade you that the great question of Free Trade is a party question; but I say it is a question of life or death, a national question, if ever there was one.  (Cheers)  They have talked to you about the faults of Mr. Gregg, and the manufacturers; but they are silent on the virtues of the landowners; I, therefore, will try to supply the deficiency. 

    Millowners, mills, and machinery, the landowners tell us, are bad things; but suppose them all missing tomorrow, where would two-thirds of you be before the end of the year?  In the grave, or in the bellies of famished dogs.  But the landowners are all good fellows, they tell you.  How do they prove it?  By first robbing you of eightpence in the shilling, then passing their New Poor Law, and bidding you live on your own resources; or by giving away a flannel waistcoat at Christmas to some servile rascal, bribed to deceive you or coerce you, and expecting you, who pay for it a hundred times over, to doff your hats for a present you don't receive.

    How did these kind-hearted landowners treat their great captive, Napoleon?  They starved him; they refused him a pair of whole shoes to die in; they would not let him totter to his grave dry-shod; and he now lies buried in a pair of shoes, through the ends of which his lifeless toes penetrate; so much for the mercy and humanity of British landowners! 

    Not their Corn Laws, they tell you, but machinery competing with machinery here, is the cause of your distress; as if it were not plain that if we were allowed to swap for food the produce of our competing machinery, we could not have too much of such produce, or plenty of food must be a curse; and that it is, I think, you are not silly enough to believe.  (Cheers)


The speech displays some typically colourful language for Elliott, who had a reputation as an orator. The Corn Law Rymer had played a major role in introducing the Charter to Sheffield, so it is hardly surprising to see him on the platform at this meeting.  In fact, the bard had been at the front of the movement nationally in the early days of the Charter something which most commentators have missed or ignored.  For more information on Elliott's work with the Charter, see the book "People, Poems and Politics of Ebenezer Elliott, Corn Law Rhymer" by Keith Morris (pub in 2005); namely the sections "Elliott & the Westminster Chartist Meeting" and "Early Days of Chartism in Sheffield."



ELLIOTT'S POSSESSIONS IN 1816 WHEN HE WAS DECLARED BANKRUPT


Although Elliott went bankrupt in Rotherham, details of his personal possessions appeared in a Sheffield newspaper.  A notification appeared in the Sheffield Mercury on 14th December 1816 that a sale was to take place of the bankrupt's possessions on December 18th and 19th.  The poet was 35 years old in 1816, was married with a family of six children, so the loss of so many possessions would have been a severe blow; remember,too, they family had lost its home as well. Presumably, Ebenezer's father offered accommodation in his home - though this is speculation.  Note that the list below omits several items which were illegible. 



BANKRUPT'S  EFFECTS

FREE FROM DUTY

Valuable Household Furniture, Books, and other Effects

To be Sold by Auction

By Mr. Graves,

Upon the Premises of the Foundry of Mr Ebenezer Elliott, jun, a Bankrupt, at Masbrough, near Rotherham, on Wednesday and Thursday, the 18th and 19th days of December, 1816.

ALL THE
HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE, &c
CONSISTING OF

*    The Sale will begin each morning at ten o'clock

-----------------------

ALSO WILL BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
THE LATTER END OF JANUARY NEXT,
THE  FOUNDRY

Of the above Mr. EBENEZER ELLIOTT,

Together with all the Machinery, Utensils, and Stock in Trade of finished and unfinished Goods, Raw Materials,&c.  Notice of which will be given in future papers and handbills.

For particulars in the mean time, application must be made to Messrs WHEATLEY and BADGER, Rotherham, Solicitors to the Assignees.


For more on Elliott's bankruptcy, please see "Ebenezer Elliott: Corn Law Rhymer and Poet of the Poor" by Keith Morris & Ray Hearne, chapter 4, pages 24-6.



To return to Ebenezer Research Foundry, please strike the anvil