foundry masthead




The Sheffield Political Union and the Corn Law Rhymer

 


          Political unions were set up in the 1830s as a result of a lack of confidence in the way that the country was governed. In fact, the government of the day was not open to reform, believing that the status quo was ok. The working classes and middle classes saw the need for parliamentary reform though and flocked to join political unions. The political unions were peaceful but also powerful and did much to restrain outbreaks of violence. They may even have prevented the country from a disastrous revolution.

 

          The first political union was set up in Birmingham in 1830. In the same year the Sheffield Political Union was established. A meeting was held on the 27th of November 1830 in Campo Lane at the home of George Knowles. William Lee was selected as chairperson and Thomas Orme as secretary. It is believed that Ebenezer Elliott was  not on the committee. The main objects of the Union were:-

1.     The reform of parliament

2.      The redress of all public and political grievances

3.     If the franchise was achieved, they were for promoting and securing the return of free, able and efficient members of parliament to represent Hallamshire.

 

          On the 3rd of December 1830, the Sheffield Political Union decided the subscription to join the Union was to be 6d a quarter. The meeting also decided that they should adopt the rules and regulations of the Birmingham Political Union.

 

Some of the Articles of the Sheffield Political Union

 

Article 1: To be good, faithful and loyal subjects to the king

Article 2: To obey the laws of the land, and, where they ceased to protect the rights, liberties, and interests of the community, to endeavour to get them changed by just, legal,  and peaceful means only.

Article 6: To bear in mind the strength of our society consists in the peace, order, unity, and legality of our proceedings; and to consider all persons as enemies who shall in anyway invite or promote violence, discord, or any illegal or doubtful measures.

[A complete listing of the rules of the Sheffield Political Union is available in Sheffield  Libraries Local  History pamphlets volume 63 number 14]

 

          At a meeting of the Sheffield Political Union on 14th of December 1830, it was agreed to set up a sub committee which would see that the rules of the Political Union were published. (Note here that Ebenezer Elliot was surprisingly not on this sub committee). Another meeting would be held to set up a Council. The rules of the Union contained ten objects, 16 rules and regulations, and 7 duties of members. There were also 9 duties of council members plus two pages of comments. The rules of the Political Union were to be published and were sold at the price of 1d.

          Another meeting was held on Jan 10th 1831; the meeting announced:-

We, the undersigned, a committee appointed after preliminary meeting of the Sheffield Political Union, held this day at the town hall, hereby convene a public meeting of the members of the Sheffield political union, to be held at the town hall, on Monday the 24th instant, at 12:00 at noon, to elect a council for the present year, and any other business.

 There were 44 signatures, but Ebenezer Elliott was not one of them. This list of signatures can be seen in the Sheffield Independent Saturday 22nd January 1831.

                The next meeting was on 24th of January 1831 at 12 noon.  (The meeting was reported in the Sheffield Independent on Jan 31st pages 2 and 4). There was so much interest that not everyone could get into the Town Hall where the meeting was held. Thomas Asline Ward was elected President, and a Council of thirty members was appointed; they are listed below:-


Thomas Asline Ward , Dr Knight, S Bailey, B Sayle, J Sykes, Rev F Dixon, Dr Holland, J S Bramhall,   Linley, Joshua Wigfull, B. Skidmore, D. Haslehurst, e Bramley, John Ward, Thomas Orme, E. Jackson, John Bridgeford, E. Barker, G. Dalton jun, J Wild, W. Fisher, L. Palfreyman, R. Swallow, W.  Lee, J. Tobin, R Leader, A. Davidson, J. Gibson, S Woodcock George Johnson, Isaac Ironside, W Simpson, E Rhodes.


           This meeting was the first official meeting of the Union - this date of 1831 has sometimes wrongly been taken as the founding of the Union.  [Thomas Asline Ward was a very important Sheffield man in the 19th century. Brief notes on him are available in the article Friends and Contacts of the Corn Law Rhymer]. Ward made a long speech. Other speeches were made by Mr B. Sayle, Dr Knight, Mr Bramley, Luke Palfreyman, Isaac Ironside and Mr Dalton.


          Another meeting was held on 7th February 1831.  This was the "First Meeting Called By The Council Of The Political Union." An article about the meeting appeared in the Sheffield Independent Sat 12th Feb 1831 page 2 column 3. Thomas Asline Ward was in the chair.  The meeting was: -

"To consider the propriety of petitioning parliament to pass a law to compel the votes at elections for members of parliament to be taken by ballot." The meeting agreed to petition Parliament: "Your petitioners respectfully represent that any plan of reform would be unsatisfactory which did not prevent the bribery and corruption, intimidation, tumult, profligacy, and expense which now takes place at the election of members of Parliament." They added: "Your petitioners therefore humbly pray .... that you will enact a law to compel all electors to give their vote by ballot."

            


Public Meeting On Parliamentary Reform

            Shortly after the Political Union meeting in February, members of the Political Union petitioned the Master Cutler to arrange a public meeting on the reform of Parliament. The Master Cutler agreed to do this.  (The Corn Law Rhymer was not a signatory to the petition: his "Corn Law Rhymes" had been published to some acclaim the previous year and he was busy producing a new edition). The Sheffield Independent gave extensive coverage of the reform meeting in its edition for Sat March 5th 1831. Robert Leader, the proprietor of the newspaper was a member of the Political Union.

            In  June 1832, there was great jubilation at the Passing of the Reform Bill. On Monday June 18th, there was a massive march in Sheffield with 30,000 people taking part; the march taking 45 minutes to pass. According to the Sheffield Courant newspaper: "The procession was the most imposing thing we ever saw." The procession began at 12 noon with several prominent citizens leading on horseback. The Political Union (all 5,000 of them) then followed; each member proudly wearing a Union Jack "ribband" and a Political Union medal made especially for the occasion by James Dixon & Sons at their Cornish Place works.  This exuberant procession was a huge, triumphant celebration of the passing of the Reform Bill.  There were dozens of flags flying, several banners were displayed and there were at least three bands marching. Thirty friendly societies were in the procession and also twelve freemasons' lodges. Two unions took part and at least eight large manufacturers had floats. For instance, the print workers of Sheffield had two floats; each with a working press on board. One press was printing and distributing a poem by  the Corn Law Rhymer called "The Press." The poem is shown at the end of this article.  As the procession wound its way around the town centre, rockets were set off at several points and even the town guns were fired. What an occasion!



          The Rotherham Political Union also struck a medal to celebrate the Reform Bill. The medal revealed that the Political Union was founded on May 12th 1832. It is not known if Ebenezer Elliott, with his Rotherham background, was involved with the Rotherham Political Union, but this seems very likely. As the Corn Law Rhymer wrote a poem for the Rotherham Political Union, this would suggest that he had a role in the Rotherham Political Union.

          After the Sheffield march was over, the Sheffield Political Union gathered at 4pm in the Hyde Park Cricket Ground for a celebratory meal. One thousand people sat down to dinner! The Union had eleven tables with a band playing at the top table. Thomas Asline Ward, President of the Union, made a speech from the top table while the Rev Jacob Brettell said the prayers and also made a speech. Ebenezer Elliott made a speech, too, and proposed a toast, as did several other members of the Union. Elliott's speech is shown lower down this Page

          Jacob Brettell was a minister in Rotherham and was a great influence on Elliott when the latter was living in Rotherham. With both Brettell and Elliott being important figures in the Sheffield Political Union, it is almost certain that the two friends were in the Rotherham Political Union as well. Probably on the committee.

          In March 1833, Elliott and other officers resigned and the Sheffield Political Union collapsed. Their reforming energies then went into the Sheffield Mechanics’ Anti-Bread-Tax Society which Elliott had established in 1830.

          The Corn Law Rhymer wrote a song for the Sheffield Political Union and also one for the Rotherham Political Union. Both are shown below.

          According to Wikipedia, the prime movers with the Sheffield Political Union were Ebenezer Elliott and his friend, Isaac Ironside.








ELLIOTT'S SPEECH & TOAST AT THE POLITICAL UNION'S DINNER


MR. EBENEZER ELLIOTT, Author of “Corn Law Rhymes,” being called for, mounted the table, and in a maiden speech, spoke as follows:-

“Fellow Countrymen! my confidence in the manly integrity of the British character assures me, that the toast which I am about to propose, will be welcomed unanimously.

‘OUR AGRICULTURAL FRIENDS, AND MAY THEY FARE BETTER WITHOUT CORN LAWS, THAN THEY HAVE YET FARED WITH THEM.’ (Cheers.)

If I proceed to make a few observations, you, I am sure, will not condemn them, merely because they come from one of the people. Many years ago, I remember, during the trial of our broken- hearted, murdered Queen, - a magistrate of this district suddenly making his appearance in our humble newsroom at Rotherham. I forgot which of the ‘Non mi recordo' cross examinations it was that  provoked an indignant grunt from me, but this I do not forget, that I was immediately treated as a swine by the magistrate. I had the misfortune to say, that I thought such prosecutions as that of the ill-used Queen, had a tendency to cover all England with jacobinism. ‘You think so, do you?’ said the magistrate staring at me, with the eyes of a coal heaver. ‘You think so, do you? but of what consequence is it what such people as you think?’ (Hear, hear.) The person, mark you, who thus insolently addressed me, was an intruder. He would not now address me, in a similar way, any where. Things are altered. It is, at length, of some importance what the productive classes of the people of England think. (Hear, hear). Would they have been permitted, and taught to think earlier! And would to heaven, that their betters, as they call themselves, after the battle of Waterloo, instead of converting our customers into rivals, and defending themselves from taxes by means of corn laws, had manfully set to work to reduce the taxation! They would have now been safe, and far better off, without corn laws, than with them. But that they are yet, and, I hope, soon destined to thrive better without corn laws than with them I firmly believe, because I believe in God; because I can’t believe, the Author of all good ever intended to bring into existence more human beings than could live comfortably upon the surface which he has allotted for the habitation and which surface is limited - limited by his goodness and wisdom for the promotion of our intellectual growth.

When the great, the all-important, and most awful question of the corn laws shall come under the consideration of a parliament truly representing us and our interests, it will, I trust, in accordance with the calm and honest character of Englishmen, be considered coolly and decided mercifully. Of this I am sure, wronged though we have been and are, through the bone and marrow – that no tradesmen, no manufacturer, will wish his representative to forget - no not for a moment, that there are men called farmers, our brethren, who have wives and children, and yet some little capital left to lose like ourselves. (Cheers.) But let them not  lose it, placed as they are by the unnatural competition for farms, of which the corn laws are the cause, in a situation of tremendous danger; let not their little remaining capital be sacrificed. Let there be no more legislative destruction of capital. (Hear, hear). We have suffered too much in that way too lately.

Not many years ago, an administration, calling itself liberal and pretending to advocate the principles of free trade, rashly interfered with the freedom of trade in money. Not only did they compel us to receive the note which we did not want, and  prevent us from having the note which we did want, but this they did without shewing, as they were bound to shew, that there is any difference in principle between a one pound note and a five pound note. The consequences have been incalculably disastrous. For had one pound being allowed to circulate, regulated only by its own law,  - the simple law of the case, the plain law of free trade, commonsense, and common honesty – namely, that it should be paid in cash on demand at the counter of the issuer, and not in bank notes, for there was the fallacy, thence came the ruin; had the thousand banks of the empire, each and all, being compelled to find gold for themselves, instead of being made to expect, that one huge overgrown nuisance of an establishment, could or would find gold for all England, and find it in greatest quantity when it was contrary to the interests of that establishment to furnish any gold at all, namely when bullion was rising in price; then, I say, the crisis of 1825 would not have happened - the destruction of capital which we have witnessed, or sustained, would not have taken place; and the enormous consequent misery - slow, silent, unheard, unseen, or loud and invisible, everywhere heard, and seen everywhere - we should not now have to deplore, and deplore in vain.

Let us, then, have no more legislative destruction. No man gains by destruction of capital. By the destruction to which I have alluded, the pensioners themselves, whose incomes have been doubled by it, will not gain, - no, for in the end, it will deprive them of their pensions; and, perhaps, it may be said, as some believe, and as I have thought – that Peel's bill has carried the Reform Bill! (Hepar, hear). Let us, then, I repeat, have no more wholesale ruin by Act of Parliament. But when we come to the consideration of the awful, vital question of bread, through the medium of men who shall indeed represent the people of England, let us meet it as members of one firm, determined to secure the greatest profit, with the least possible loss, and then, with the wisdom and honesty which I ascribe to the British character, calmly and fairly divide the proceeds, that is, according to the just share of each partner in the concern. If a person so very inconsiderable as I am, after trespassing on your forbearance in a way which many of you may deem irrelevant, might presume, might venture to express his humble, perhaps, contemptible opinion, of what ought to be done, when the time for action arrives, then, I say, the trade in corn ought to be free, but a duty ought for a time, to be imposed on foreign corn, and that duty or not, at first, to be a small one. (Hear). The duty would, at least, have this great advantage, that it would go into the Britisth Exchequer, instead of going, as at present, into the pockets of foreigners and gamblers. I am prepared to show that a fixed duty would conduce to the final and speedy extinction of the Corn Laws; for, though there are unhappily many men who cannot, or will not understand even so simple a proposition as that two loaves are better than one, yet we can all understand that a tax is a tax – (Laughter) - we are all willing to have less to pay, and we are never unwilling to believe that a heavy burden ought to be made lighter. A fixed duty would have the further advantage of shewing what the landlords cost us. When the day for consideration arrives, and may it come quickly, we had need exert all our best good qualities, or ever the silver cord be loosed, or the golden bowl be broken - ere the bulwarks of property be overthrown- ere calamity come as one that travelleth, and want as an armed man- ere the walls of the social edifice give way, the floor sink beneath our feet, and the roof descend in thunder. I propose then-

 

'Our agricultural friends, may they fare better without Corn Laws than they will or can with them'".

 



          Elliott's speech above was taken from The Courant. This Sheffield newspaper gave a great coverage of the procession and of the speeches made afterwards at the celebratory Political Union dinner. The next speaker, Mr Boultbee, praised the Corn Law Rhymer for "his very eloquent address."  I suppose that Boultbee had to say something positive about Elliott's speech but the speech seems rambling and without the poet's usual power and bombast. It probably was not prepared in advance and was spouted off the cuff.


 

[For further information on the Sheffield Political Union, see “Radical Activity in Sheffield 1830-1848” by Betty Thickett. (Durham University thesis, 1952). A copy is available at Sheffield Library Archives, ref no. MD 2108/2].

 

“The Triumph of Reform”

This poem by Elliott was written in 1832 for the Sheffield Political Union and was sung to the tune “Rule Britannia.”






When woe-worn France first sternly spread

Her banner'd rainbow on the wind;

To smite rebellious Reason dead,

The kings of many lands combined.

Did they triumph? So they deem’d:

Could they triumph? No! They dream’d.

 

From Freedom’s ashes at their call

A form of might arose, and blazed:

‘Tis true they saw the phantom fall;

‘Tis true they crush’d the powers they raised;

But in conflict with the wise,

Vain are armies, leagues, and lies.

 

Not Freedom – no! but Freedom’s foe,

The baffled league of kings o’erthrew;

We conquer’d them, though slaves can show

They conquer’d us at Waterloo:

Mind is mightier than the strong!

Right hath triumph’d over wrong!

 

By sordid lusts to ruin led,

Come England’s foes, ye self-undone!

Behold for what ye taxed our bread!

Is this the Mont Saint Jean ye won?

Hark the rabble's triumph lay!-

Sturdy beggars! who are they?



Go, call your Czar! hire all his hordes!

Arm Caesar Hardinge! League and plot!

Mind smites you with her wing of words,

And nought shall be, where mind is not.

Crush’d to nothing – what you are –

Wormlings! will you prate of war?


No paltry fray, no bloody day,

That crowns with praise, the baby-great;

The Deed of Brougham, Russell, Grey,

The Deed that’s done, we celebrate!

Mind’s great Charter! Europe saved!

Man for ever unenslaved!

 

O could the wise, the brave, the just,

Who suffer’d – died – to break our chains;

Could Muir, could Palmer, from the dust,

Could murder’d Gerald hear our strains;

Then would martyrs, throned in bliss,

See all ages bless’d in this.

 



            Another poem which the Corn Law Rhymer wrote for the Rotherham Political Union is listed below. It was written in 1832 and was called Hymn Written for the Rotherham Political Union, and Sung There on the Celebration of the Passing of the Three Reform Bills.


We thank Thee, Lord of earth and heav’n,

For hope, and strength, and triumph given!

We thank Thee that the fight is won,

Although our work is but begun.

 

We met, we crush’d the evil powers;

A noble task must now be ours –

The victims maim’d and poor to feed,

And bind the bruised and broken reed.

 

O let not Ruin’s will be done,

When Freedom’s fight is fought and won!

The deed of Brougham, Russell, Grey,

Outlives the night! Lord, give us day!

 

 Grant time, grant patience, to renew,

What England’s foes and thine o’erthrew ; -

If they destroy'd, let us restore,

And say to Misery, mourn no more.

 


Lord, let the human storm be still’d!

Lord, let the million mouths be fill’d!

Let labour cease to toil in vain!

Let England be herself again!

 

Then shall this land her arms stretch forth,

To bless the East, and tame the North;

On tyrants' hearths wake buried souls,

And call to life the murder’d Poles.

 

Sing, Britons, sing! The sound shall go

Wherever Freedom finds a foe:

This day a trumpet’s voice is blown

O’er every despot’s heart and throne.

 

 


/





          The poem below was written by the Corn Law Rhymer in 1832 and was called "The Press." It was written for the printers of Sheffield on the occasion of the huge march to celebrate the passing of the Reform Bill.



God said---"Let there be light!"

       Grim darkness felt his might,

          And fled away;

       Then startled seas and mountains cold

       Shone forth, all bright in blue and gold,

         And cried---"'Tis day! 'tis day!"

 

       "Hail, holy light!" exclaim'd

       The thund'rous cloud, that flamed

          O'er daisies white;

       And, lo! the rose, in crimson dress'd,

       Lean'd sweetly on the lily's breast;

          And, blushing, murmur'd---"Light!"

 

       Then was the skylark born;

       Then rose th' embattled corn;

          Then floods of praise

       Flow'd o'er the sunny hills of noon;

       And then, in stillest night, the moon

          Pour'd forth her pensive lays.

 

       Lo, heaven's bright bow is glad!

       Lo, trees and flowers all clad

          In glory, bloom!

 And shall the mortal sons of God

       Be senseless as the trodden clod,

          And darker than the tomb?

No, by the mind of man!

       By the swart artisan!

          By God, our Sire!

       Our souls have holy light within,

       And every form of grief and sin

          Shall see and feel its fire.

 

       By earth, and hell, and heav'n,

       The shroud of souls is riven!

          Mind, mind alone

       Is light, and hope, and life, and power!

       Earth's deepest night, from this bless'd hour,

          The night of minds is gone!

 

       "The Press!" all lands shall sing;

        The Press, the Press we bring,

          All lands to bless:

       O pallid Want! O Labour stark!

       Behold, we bring the second ark!

          The Press! the Press! the Press!





          Elliott also wrote a poem called "The Heroes of Cutlerdom."  The poem was another one published in 1832, the year of the jubilation over the passing of the Reform Bill. The poem has not appeared in amy collections of poetry by the bard and is declared to be a newly discovered poem found in a newspaper article. The poem lists eminent Sheffield people who had played a role in the reform movement. "Cutlerdom" appears to be Elliott's name for Sheffield's famous cutlery industry. The text of the poem can be found in New Poems (2),




Return to Elliott's home page, click here

Return to Elliott's poetry pages

Click the anvil to return to the Ebenezer Research Foundry     anvil